"Gun
Control" is Socially Non-Sustainable.
The ideal
world is a sustainable world (sustainable both--ecologically and
socially) where each action (both--ecological and political) makes
the world more balanced.
Currently the world is mostly being shaped by decisions made with
only a shortsighted concern about those decisions' effects. We are
inured to this non-sustainable way of dealing with the majority of
our problems.
The campaign against the ownership of weapons is socially
non-sustainable, because it does not deal with the underlying
causes of problems connected with gun ownership. It creates a large
group of people who feel, undoubtedly, that they being wronged.
Their discontent will be creating many new problems
ceaselessly.
Socially sustainable solution to this would be to deal with the
causes--try to do away with the need for having to own guns,
and to find and deal with the causes of societal stress that causes
most of antisocial behavior.
All parties to any conflict should "sit down" together to workout
together what their mutual, to all agreeable co-existence should
be, and from there start making it a reality. They would address
the causes of the whichever problem, and deal with those to resolve
those.
Thank you, Hearthstone - ModelEarth.Org .
|
